<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Equivariant on Neumo</title><link>https://blog.neumo.top/tags/equivariant/</link><description>Recent content in Equivariant on Neumo</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:03:50 +0800</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://blog.neumo.top/tags/equivariant/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>A Guide to Equivariance Theory for Chemists</title><link>https://blog.neumo.top/posts/equivariant/</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:03:50 +0800</pubDate><guid>https://blog.neumo.top/posts/equivariant/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Suppose we want to simulate the motion of atoms in a molecule or a material. In principle, the forces on the nuclei come from quantum mechanics. In practice, this is hard because the full electron-nuclear Schrodinger equation is far too expensive to solve at every molecular dynamics step.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The usual starting point is the Born-Oppenheimer approximation. Since nuclei are much heavier and move much more slowly than electrons, we treat the nuclear positions as fixed while solving the electronic problem. Let&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>